http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/18/motorolas-razr-i-benchmar...
Also, it's important to note that JS engine optimizations play a huge role in this test, so it's not all just hardware performance, but that doesn't necessarily mean Intel has a disadvantage here. I believe Intel has been working just as heavily to tweak the JS performance in the phones that shipped with their processor.
Also, Intel is being misleading about having a "2 Ghz processor". The thing is it will use that frequency when it's doing the benchmark, so you'll be like "wow, great performance from this chip", but then in 99% of the situations, you'll be using it at its "real frequency" of 1.6 Ghz (Anand says it's still 1.3 Ghz, Engadget may be in error there), so the real performance is probably much worse than the benchmakrs make it look.