Sure you do, to understand actual patterns in actions of members of the party.
And ignoring that, it’s general context. Part of the job of a journalist.
And ignoring that, it’s general context. Part of the job of a journalist.
Or to construct patterns that don't reflect reality.
Should we also list their ages, ethnicity, religious affiliation(s) in each article mentioning a Congressperson and construct those patterns as well?
Sorry, I'd like to think on my own.
When articles always mention party affiliation, people will judge the politician's behavior based on the affiliation, and not on his actions.