Hacker News Reader

> Literally no one who is not connected to the "AI" industrial complex praises "AI".

Why lying when one can easily find examples of exactly that?

But I’m sure you could find the connections to the AI industry complex somehow.

It is more difficult to trace the funding of these. Also of course if you label something "AI" even if it really isn't you automatically get funding.

Thank you for this context, should be the title IMO..

In the same vein, any link to Gary Marcus’s blog posts should be labeled “AI hater”, don’t you think?

People do that here, and mostly they are not downvoted or flagged (though sometimes they are).

But the important part is that the funding for "AI" skeptics is practically zero, whereas the funding for "AI" boosters is basically unlimited.

For clarity, all the parent said was John Jumper is the current director at Google DeepMind. Which I think is useful context, not sure why flagged..

I'm a researcher in AI and I haven't met anyone who has gotten substantial help from AI.

Many people have tried, many people have been let down.

in the scientific domain?

Follow the money…