This isn't about me. It's a generic moral question:

A verbed B

C suggested the Law of Reciprocity: that D should verb A (because A verbed B without due process, and A is sponsoring verbing of thousands of people)

C was banned by A for discussing such offense. I.e. A is bullying C about discussing A's verbing of B with intent to censor obstructively.

If just discussing verbing is wrong, isn't actually verbing wrong and furthermore more wrong than suggesting the Golden Rule at cruel and unusual punishment without due process?