A verbed B
C suggested the Law of Reciprocity: that D should verb A (because A verbed B without due process, and A is sponsoring verbing of thousands of people)
C was banned by A for discussing such offense. I.e. A is bullying C about discussing A's verbing of B with intent to censor obstructively.
If just discussing verbing is wrong, isn't actually verbing wrong and furthermore more wrong than suggesting the Golden Rule at cruel and unusual punishment without due process?
The rule says to treat others the way you wish to be treated by them. It does not say do onto others as they did to you or to others. I.e. if verbing is wrong, you should not verb A or suggest to verb A.