https://www.un.org/en/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/... https://hatecrime.osce.org/hate-crime-legislation-italy
https://www.un.org/en/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/... https://hatecrime.osce.org/hate-crime-legislation-italy
That’s not demonstrating an ability to reason. If the law says Allah (or any other figure) is the one true god, is that then true?
Laws can be wrong. They can be passed by motivated actors seeking to protect their own power and policy. Free speech means protecting speech which is offense. You don’t need free speech protection for inoffensive speech.
Further, by equating speech to violence you’re allowing them to react with actual violence to defend themselves against views they don’t like. This is catastrophic for liberal society.
You probably cannot read:
Art. 604-bis [Propaganda and incitement to commit crime for discrimination on racial, ethnic and religious grounds]
Unless the fact constitutes a more serious offence:
a) whoever disseminates ideas based on racial superiority or racial/ethnic hatred, or incites to commit/commits discrimination acts on racial, ethnic, national or religious grounds shall be punished with imprisonment up to one year and six months or with a fine up to 6,000 euro;
as you were comrade