The whole point of my post is that you get to pick and choose what parts this magical software automates for you. Based on your response, it's an imagination issue for you.
Being able to imagine something doesn't mean I have to like it.
> Write the test names down and let the LLM implement them for you.
This sort of reinforces the idea I (and I believe others) have that people mostly talk past each other on this topic. It seems like there might be some other difference in understanding and/or practice when it comes to using these tools effectively. This seems to be a common issue to notice once one starts noticing it.