Because humans evolved on Earth and not on Venus.
If we evolved on Venus then it would be our Eden.
> They’ve been pushing their model Earth to its extremes
Is your model anywhere good enough to be able to get useful outcomes from this process? I would suspect not. I mean, we know this planet's state is partially owed to the many unique comet impacts that have occurred during it's life, are you modelling those?
I don't think we can just anthropic principle this one away. We couldn't have evolved on Venus. It's valid to ask whether any complex life could.
> Is your model anywhere good enough to be able to get useful outcomes from this process? I would suspect not
Got it, reflexive blanket dismissal comment.
That's obviously the point I was making.
> Got it, reflexive blanket dismissal comment.
No, I said my _suspicion_ is that you cannot, and you're being a hypocrite.
No, it obviously wasn't.
It obviously isn't given you followed up with "if we evolved on Venus."
> I said my _suspicion_ is that you cannot
Which you followed up by dismissing the work for suspecting it did not consider [insert random armchair complication].
> you're being a hypocrite
Nope. I actually read and thought about your comment, initially in good faith.
Merely "because humans evolved on Earth and not on Venus" is just a dismissive contrarian take that says absolutely nothing of any value what-so-ever.
> If we evolved on Venus then it would be our Eden
That's about the connotations of the words "Hell" and "Eden", not about the facts being discussed.
And why did humans evolve on Earth but not Venus? In fact no life evolved on Venus that we know of.