Please don't take HN threads into flamewar hell like this. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. Your comment would be (mostly) fine without that bit.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Edit: we've had to ask you this several times already:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44403432 (June 2025)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41830571 (Oct 2024)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41710557 (Oct 2024)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40852424 (July 2024)
No, I do not care about their choices, provided they are willing to bear all costs from it. The problem is not living in the suburbs. The problem is affluent people that have their lifestyle subsidized by poorer people living close to the city center.
Also, it's virtually impossible to claim that people want to live like that in the US, because most places have zoning laws that simply forbid the emergence of any other alternative. Suburbs in Germany are smaller, less dense versions of the urban center, but they are not devoid of life. They are still walkable, they still have local shops, they do not make cars a requirement for everyone, kids do not need to be driven around anywhere, etc. You can bet that if more people in the US could come to visit they would rather live like that than in the traditional cul-de-sacs/picketed fence developments from American Suburbia.
The corporations who are lobbying and funding the campaign of "Trucker Bob" and "Soccer Mom Susan".
You're conflating "the cause is unpopular" with "the cause organically became unpopular".