The fact that this administration routinely implements policies of all types in this way suggests that rambunctious implementation is the default explanation for any particular outcome.
Neither do you.
Hanlon's razor is a good baseline when you have no information pointing to either option.
But when you have an administration that climbs onto a podium and announces they want to traumatize people, that's a pretty direct admission of malice in my books. You're free to conclude we're just seeing a string of repeated stupidity, but frankly I think it's incredibly naive to still given them the benefit of doubt.
When you find yourself violating a philosophical razor, it's a strong indication that you should question your priors.