I can take the point that some AI features are oversold or under-considered, but suggesting that these new technologies are not driving business innovation is just completely indefensible to the point that the argument is absurd on its face.
How did you take that away from my post?
AI can provide genuine value and also be a hype train. The two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
I put "mobile revolution" in quotes because I was referring to what it was being called at the time, in the context of describing how said "revolution" was affecting me at a time when I had no interest in mobile computing or features. I was relating to the parent who has little to no interest in AI features and wishes that companies would stop trying to "force" it on them.
At no point did I even come close to suggesting that there is no value or innovation to be found there. My last paragraph even directly stated the opposite.
Are you trolling?