Hacker News Reader

It's not that the plants are less reliable. The technology is great. It's the humans that aren't reliable.

If the humans operating the plants are not reliable, it means the plants are unreliable. You're running in circles with your argument.

I don't think you know what circular reasoning is.

Are you seriously suggesting that anything that isn't designed against every conceivable example of human incompetence, is a flawed design?