Hacker News Reader

Comment by SilverElfin | Hacker News Reader

This is about PeerTube. I really want this project to succeed but it’s been many years and basically no one has heard of it. Is it really worth directing people to? The positioning of PeerTube, Framasoft, etc gets confusing for an everyday person like me.

View on HN

As an everyday person, you can continue to use YouTube to discover and consume content.

It's more like, if you find a maker of content that you like, they might happen to have a PeerTube or other independent YouTube-like site up as well, as a backup or larger archive of their material.

The independently hosted FOSS alternatives are more for people who create content and don't want to or can't depend on the good graces of bigtech to indefinitely host their content for whatever reason (usually a practical matter, sometimes even underlying political factors).

For instance, YouTube will scan new content automatically and zap the channel if it says the wrong couple words more than a few times.

Maybe that's not a problem for a lot of channels. But there were definitely tons of creators who got burned by that kind of cancelling over the last n years.

So I imagine, yes, some entrepreneurial, technical, and communication-oriented folks would be interested in things like PeerTube, YouPHPTube (which is actually quite good) [1], etc.

[1] https://youphp.tube

> For instance, YouTube will scan new content automatically and zap the channel if it says the wrong couple words more than a few times.

This type of censorship is why I think decentralized video is important. But if it isn’t accessible to everyday people there will be low views and it hurts the availability of censored content.

Whenever I look at PeerTube there is basically no high quality stuff on it - i look through it for 5-10 minutes and it’s all bad. To me it’s so far removed from what YouTube is i find it hard to compare the two - it might market itself as an alternative but I don’t see how that can be

We have to distinguish delivery and discovery. Any competing video platform will have a very skewed selection of content at the start, biased towards stuff YouTube doesn't want to show its users, and in most cases, with good reason (i.e, stuff the users wouldn't want to see). Any kind of popularity-on-the-platform based filtrering will also not work, due to this skew.

yes! i think we also need to keep reminding people that discovery is not an euphemism for advertisement. and if they expect it to be this passive, detached process of being told what the good shit is and then fed it, then they're part of the problem.

i've had good experiences with discovery on decentralized platforms. it's proceeded by means totally unlike advertisement, hmm, i wonder if anyone remembers what those were?

what i find funnier is how the platforms that have actual content hate crypto, and the platforms that have crypto ... i'm not sure if they even remember what "content" was. that ain't a way to starve youtubers, it's the exact opposite. shame.

This is nice but I have zero idea how I can surface interesting or useful videos. The search function on PeerTube doesn't give me anything useful for my topics of interest.

As a result, I wind up wasting hours and I simply do not have that time.

I'm basically saying, you can't rely on on-platform discovery. You'll have to find the links to good stuff on peertube somewhere else than peertube - anywhere else. It could even be here.

Or to take it from the other perspective, if you make videos on Peertube you need to give people some way different than doomscrolling/built in search to find your stuff.

Yeah this is a good point. I have been thinking about doing some video creation and I really don't want to be locked into YouTube's platform. I want people to find my video content in some other way because I do not want YouTube to be dominating how my content is shown or becomes visible because then, they are in control of my creative process, not me. So I will stick to posting links on my website and surfacing my content by posting on sites like this. Maybe someday I will find any more automatic way of doing this at some point. I wonder if that is allowed on HN?

how do you manage to waste entire hours without ever finding anything interesting or useful to watch?

Before there was doomscrolling, there was channel surfing. It can be very easy to end up spending a lot of time looking for something good.

fair point! depends on the search space, though. can't do much channel surfing on 2 channels, one of which broadcasts in russian on fridays. (actually turns out you can; you catch cable from the neighbors' leaky wiring and discover lil kim.)

i don't think you can do much doomscrolling on peertube, either. but then, that's probably a non-goal for their project. instead i think i'll go look if there's a 3rd party frontend for that now, blessings :-)

That is simply your outdated opinion. By facts it is a better alternative as I just created an account and I see it as a better option. The joy in my words is enough to tell you how good I feel about it. Youtube is history for me and many others, your opinion will not change that.

FYI: Us humans call it "watch videos", not "consume content".

you made an account 1 hour ago to post 2 snarky comments? https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I agree with him. The whole, "consume content" phrase has a subtle effect of making us int mindless consumers rather than freedom choice thinkers. People need to stop drinking the consumer market koolaid.

That's another good objection, next to lumping all stuff into one category: some creative output is "content", not writing, or video, or spoken word, or painting, or acting or even "merch", it's all "content". Calling every item sold, from toothpaste to iron pipe to dump trucks "product" is the same: disrespectful of the thought and effort and craft that go in to making ping pong balls or airplanes.

It's an MBA's way of denigrating everything not presentable in a PowerPoint.

i dislike the phrase too but the tone of the comment was pretty shitty, apart from being off topic.

Also to think that it's the phrase "consume content" making us mindless consumer seems way off to me. What would you call most of the videos on youtube/tiktok/instagram? Art, Documentaries, Didactic aid? Perhaps "content" is the best way to refer to them.

"Videos" seems appropriate.

I make a new account every few days or so, however long it takes for the previous one to be shadow banned.

It's not a big deal.

It hasn't succeeded yet, so therefore we should stop talking about it? I never understood this line of thinking. Some new inferior but better hyped variant, like Bluesky to Mastodon? Yes, the better technology doesn't always win out, but should we make that a self-fulfilling prophecy by pre-emptively abandoning something?

The value in YouTube is their monetization network which brings real money to the people uploading videos through advetising deals and the premium subscription. This is why YT became such a juggernaut - it's not just covering its tech costs, its also providing folks with real revenue to create those videos.

And this is where Peertube isn't really the same kind of a platform so you won't see the same kind of videos.

> I really want this project to succeed but it’s been many years and basically no one has heard of it

It's about authorship, not the tool.

I hope non-profit and academia would embrace peertube.

I think it’s worth remember that at any time a service like YouTube can do something that like everyone off. It hasn’t happened yet, but when it happens, people will need a place to go to. Now imagine if people start thinking about it only after the enshittification get so bad that getting an usable alarmeis would take years.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com