Hacker News Reader

Not sure if it was that paper, but there was a similar paper showing this phenomenon which later turned out to contain an error:

https://retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21/to-our-horror-widely-...

People who left the study were actually miscoded as getting divorced.

After the adjustment the correlation was less but was still there.

No, they're not referencing the same paper.

The paper that you cited is the 2009 study: Glantz, M. J., Chamberlain, M. C., Liu, Q., Hsieh, C. C., Edwards, K. R., Van Horn, A., & Recht, L. (2009). Gender disparity in the rate of partner abandonment in patients with serious medical illness. Cancer, 115(22), 5237-5242. https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10...

That paper has been debunked. Its conclusions were based on a coding error. When the coding error is corrected for the gender disparity disappears.

Please stop citing this paper without adding that it was debunked.

See for more details: https://www.benjaminkeep.com/misinformation-on-the-internet/

> If the wife gets ill, the marriage has about a 20% chance of ending because of it. If the husband becomes ill, there is only a 3% chance.

Wrong. That paper has been debunked already. See: https://www.benjaminkeep.com/misinformation-on-the-internet/

don’t fall for this type of nonsense :)