Your comparison to hallucination is spot on.
LLMs have shown the general public how AI can be plain wrong and shouldn't be trusted for everything. Maybe this influences how they, and regulators, will think about self driving cars.
LLMs have shown the general public how AI can be plain wrong and shouldn't be trusted for everything. Maybe this influences how they, and regulators, will think about self driving cars.
And the general public?! No way. Most are completely unaware of the foibles of LLMs.
No the don't. You're making a straw man rather than trying to put forth an actual argument in support of your view.
If you feel can't support your point, then don't try to make it.
I responded to this parent comment:
"LLMs have shown the general public how AI can be plain wrong and shouldn't be trusted for everything."
You take issue with my response of:
"loads of DEVs on here will claim LLMs are infallible"
You're not really making sense. I'm not straw-manning anything, as I'm directly discussing the statement made. What exactly are you presuming I'm throwing a straw man over?
It's entirely valid to say "there are loads of supposed experts that don't see this point, and you're expecting the general public to?". That's clearly my statement.
You may disagree, but that doesn't make it a strawman. Nor does it make it a poorly phrased argument on my part.
Do pay better attention please. And your entire last sentence is way over the line. We're not on reddit.
The irony of telling someone not to be rude while being absolutely insufferable. Peak redditor behavior.
Please provide examples. Thank you!