What rational worker would want to take part in this?
I don't think LLMs will be able to pick up on what's done by an evolving and growing codebase with previous projects also included. More likely it will draw from older stuff and combine it with other people's more normal stuff and end up with an incoherent mess that won't compile. Not all work is 'come up with the correct answer to the problem, and then everybody uses it forever'.
We already see it happening in the US too, with the Nashville data centers causing immense medical issues.
The argument usually centers around the fact that LLMs aren't AGI, which is obviously true but also kinda missing the point
It's not like there is an organic bottom up movement on driving this usage. It's always top down mandated by executives with little regard on how it impacts worker's lives.
We've also seen how these tools have made certain jobs worse, not better, like translating:
https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/how-ai-is-killing-jobs-i...