- Working on hobby projects/sideprojects
- Working on open-source projects
- Selling stuff
For someone to create this example, they would either have to do it in a codebase they don't have problem open sourcing or which is open source, so they do not break NDA's and divulge company info/source code.
How many people are ready to do that?
The conditions of the OP are:
- No demo, independent programmer
- Non-greenfield project
- Non-trivial problem
- Code deployed in production and robust
- Code review, test, testing, PR creation
- Person be willing to live-stream their work and code while building
Which is a pretty unreasonable set of conditions to prove "it works", when the person could read a tutorial and try it themselves.
Secondly, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Why not? Plenty of people stream their work that later makes into production. Gaming community for example has no end of people building their games publicly.
And yet, for all the "amazing one-shot capabilities that obviate the need for programmers" no one streams working with any of the AI tools.
All we have is unverifiable claims like yours.
"Amazing one-shot capabilities" is not the same as "an extremely useful tool that saves a ton of time"
If it's as useful or saving a lot of time, it would be a no brainer for people who build in public to use this tool, right?