“With this approach, I can manage to have 10–20 pull requests open at once, each handled by a dedicated agent.”
A quote from the post. No, I think my post is calibrated quite well considering what OPs post does to our industry.
A quote from the post. No, I think my post is calibrated quite well considering what OPs post does to our industry.
It can mean, for example, that 2 agents worked for some time in a list of 20 TODO features and produced 20 PRs to be reviewed. They could have worked overnight even.
You're seemingly judging from the least generous interpretation, which is not constructive and is also against HN guidelines fyi.
Even if parallel agents is not something easily done currently, debating about ways to do it is constructive enough for me.
9-10am: I comb through our issue list, figuring out which issues are well defined, which need more input or design decision. => I pick a hand-full, lets say 10 that I kick off to run in the background, and lets say another 10 for further specification.
10-2pm: I thinker with 10 issues to figure out the exact specs and to expand the requirement list.
2pm-6pm: I review the code written by the agents, one by one. I kick off for further work things that need more input, or merge things that look good.