The fact that is has been collected is the value added.

If I go to ted.com and search for entrepreneur, I'll have to sift through 81 results, and only one of the top 10 matches the list collected here.

The reaction here reminds me of the assumptive skewering folks often receive elsewhere for innocently reposting pictures without attributing them to some unknownable [1] source.

How is someone with good intentions behind submitting a collection supposed to go about sharing it? Is there an actual problem here beyond the specific phrasing of the title or just your assumption that the submission is link-baiting?

1: Tineye and Google image search are relatively new and not exactly common knowledge.

It is an aggregation of TED talks that somebody found interesting for entrepreneurs. Picking out of the sea of TED talks the ones which are interesting. That's commendable. OP can change the title to "Top TED Talks for Entrepreneurs" and it will even fit the guidelines.

It's a pity though that the author didn't submit it himself, especially since (s)he then monitors the comments...

Well, someone does have to wade through all the videos to hopefully find the good ones and write a synopsis for each. That kind of filtering can be valuable.