Creators should be happy they're passing the cost to customers. We know they didn't choose to write on substack out of altruism.
If someone thinks you are worth enough to pay 30% more they'll pay. That's always been the case.
Creators should be happy they're passing the cost to customers. We know they didn't choose to write on substack out of altruism.
If someone thinks you are worth enough to pay 30% more they'll pay. That's always been the case.
I'm not saying that managing subscription billing has no value, but it's not like what Apple is doing has no comparison; PayPal offers similar subscription services and their cut is less than 10%.
The last paragraph is patently untrue, it's used as a clever gotcha for transactive capitalist interactions (assuming it can only be this way and no other), completely ignoring the human elements.
Honestly, I just can't see this as the little guy vs the corpo image this post is trying to make. Just two capitalistic ideas fighting one another. The people writing on here must have better paying jobs for their livelihood. The authors are treating their blogs as business which turns off the part of my brain with human emotional concerns.
Life isn't binary, but our choices often are.