> Also, the incentives of a cheaper than market rate flat, means that corruption and nepotism is rampant in those buildings.
But if it were a flat/apartment, the owner/manager may not actually take good care of the apartment. Which is worse?
But if it were a flat/apartment, the owner/manager may not actually take good care of the apartment. Which is worse?
This is purely anecdotal, but I find that the buildings with professional management and purely renting tenants, look better and seem more well kept, compared to the smaller "Andelsforeninger" where its a volunteer management team trying to run it.