Slack puts a nicer shade of lipstick on the pig than Teams does, but the lips still belong to the same thing.
Well, that's a valid framework too, but by the practical standard of goodness – the best of trash is actually good — because you don't judge goodness against some abstract ideals, but against available choices. Both are valid frameworks, but only one is useful in practice.
I absolutely should. I hate how many applications have a UI that won't let me copy-paste an error message to search for, much less a menu item; who could possibly have thought that was a good idea?
As you point out it's wildly successful and is the backbone of many groups internal communication. Many companies would just stop working without Slack, that's a testament to the current team's efforts, but also something that critical would merit better perfs.
I'd make the comparison with Figma, which went the extra mile to bring a level of smoothness that just wouldn't be there otherwise.
It’s best in class because everything else is worse. It’s a sad state of affairs.
I've never heard anyone say that before!