I don't think either is an appropriate characterization of the situation. More likely, Apple had features they wanted that Google wouldn't license (eg turn by turn), so Apple decided to develop its own product. The license terms of the agreement for which Apple was paying Google included shipping the Google Maps app, so when Apple decided not to renew the agreement, they had to stop shipping a product called Google Maps.
Someone with in-depth knowledge of the licensing agreements! You must know exactly what happened, based on your assertion of credentials, here.
> More likely, Apple had features they wanted that Google wouldn't license (eg turn by turn)
Wouldn't? Or couldn't? Do you know? Do you care? It seems your mind is made up despite not having the inside knowledge you assert.
My mind is not in the least way made up. I'm curious where that came from, honestly. That's a strong assertion that I actually tried to keep out of my post as I hypothesized what I saw as a plausible scenario given only whats been in the media.
I have no clue, and I highly doubt anybody posting here does, either.
You said it was "more likely," implying you had some reason to believe it besides what people say on the Internet.
But that's different from doing a specific edge-case breakage with a petulant message.