Not necessarily. The security issues are with the libxml implementation, a different one might be more secure even with JIT. That's part of what makes the whole situation so ridiculous.
JS is already required to have a XML DOM parser, an universal XSLT engine in JS should be a low-effort web to continue supporting XSLT, as for performance the transform could probably be eval'ed and cached to JS snippets so that they in turn become JIT-compiled.
Somehow they have an issue with supporting, fixing (and updating to latest version) this particular one. Possibly because it doesn't result in promotions.