It would be simple to have bullet points that say things like:
1. You cannot get rid of student debt by bankrupcy.
2. The Govt can garnish wages, social security, and other monies if you dont make regular payments.
3. etc....
But yet, we are sold a bill of goods called "Public University" that has routinely jacked up rates much higher than inflation. Where's the public funding making costs cheap? Or, why are private, for-profit colleges protected from bankruptcy as well?My mom (in her late 50's), tells me when she was going to university, she would only have to work during summer a job or 2 to pay for schooling for fall and spring. If she picked up a job on campus, she'd have spending money for luxuries and such. That's what public funding did for her. Not so much for this day and age.
Why would more dollars competing for the same exclusive good (enrollment in a particular college) drive the price down?
All it takes are a dedicated group of politicians to give a collective shit.
(And for the record, I don't expect you to debate every point or be an expert on the matter. I'm just saying that it's not a cut and dry issue, in my mind.)
Actually, it exists nowadays. Students (in the US) receiving loans are required to complete a loan counseling session, which covers the pros, cons and responsibilities of student debt.
However, this is a relatively recent development that probably wasn't around for the people in the article.