Commented on this the other day, I think AI is fundamentally different from ride share apps and Uber for X services. It's more likely to follow a Moore's law trajectory. Getting cheaper and better over time?
Or at least cheaper.
Or at least cheaper.
Right?
Where as to get AI to any sort of approximation of what it's hyped up to be, may involve exponentially higher hardware costs.
So for the longest period of time, AI was sitting in about 90% accuracy. With the use of Nvidia hardware it's going to say 99 to 99.9%. I don't think it's actually 99.9%
To replace humans, I think you effectively need 99.999% and even more depending on the domain like self-driving is probably eight nines.
What's the hardware cost to get each one of those nines linear polynomial? Exponential?
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s...
This is not even considering the fact that the performance has also increased.