Ah no that’s not what I said. But a lot of healthcare systems in Europe are close to communism yes (but they’re hybrid, there’s also some markets mechanism)
How is an insurance backed up with taxes, related to the concept of abolishing private ownership?
Communism doesn't want to abolish private property so perhaps try to know more about the thing you're talking about before lecturing.
Sigh. What is your definition for communism then? I'm curious to hear that.
It's about the means of production… not about all property.
Universal healthcare is just an mandatory insurance scheme with an efficient centralized bureaucracy. You know, insurance, that thing that prevents markets from falling over when something goes wrong. We also have fun things like bankruptcy, which means some people don't get payed back. Should we reintroduce debter prisons to get rid of all the communism in the system?
It's different because private insurance and hospitals want to make profit
You think public insurance don't? There is a difference between making profits and placing profits above everything else.
Extracting resources and giving less in exchange is a form of making profit. Socialized healthcare does that too.
?
It varies a lot. Compare the UK, Germany and Singapore. Very different in the level of centralisation.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
There's a gaping conceptual chasm between "publicly funded" and "communist".
And there’s a big chasm between the system we have in europe and simply being “publicly funded”, so you are also simplifying reality