What a silly, uneducated and trolling point to make. Yes, and "as always" Red Hat Enterprise Linux is dragging its feet compared to Debian Trixie -- why do you think that is? Maybe Fedora, Debian and RHEL are different Linux distributions with different goals and trade-offs?

So we can add support for RISC-V which has a fraction of x86 installed base and still doesn't have an appreciable hardware standard that allows for broad compatibility between chips.

Seems highly illogical to me.

As a bootable system only. This is an important distinction. It's still possible to install :i386 libraries and run multiarch.

> As always debian is like fedora 3 years ago.

Apples and oranges much?