I recently had a team member submit code done primarily by an LLM that was clearly wrong. Rather than verifying that the change was correct, they rapid fired a cr and left it up to the team to spot problems.
They've since pushed multiple changes to fix the initial garbage of the LLM because they've adopted "move fast and break things". The appearance of progress without the substance.
This is highly rewarded in many (most?) corporate environments, so that’s not surprising.
When’s the last time you heard “when will it be done?”
When’s the last time you heard “can you demonstrate that it’s right|robust|reliable|fast enough|etc?”
Takes just a lunch break for the review to go up and get approved by someone that just made sure there's code there. (Who is also primarily using LLMs without verifying)
Plus the time you're reviewing is the time you're not coding, so of course you get dinged on your own velocity further.
Ultimately proper review is a career limiting move. Unless you're a pro auditor.