Not as many Nobel prizes - or elements on the periodic table - however. Berkeley (having many more undergrads) also has more alumni.
(But note for both schools that good researchers are not necessarily good undergraduate instructors.)
As a side note, I always found this obsession with sports to be a fascinating aspect of american culture. Being from an entirely different culture, it’s unclear to me why on earth would anyone give a fuck about this.
Also the Olympics seem to be a big thing every four years, particularly in the country where they are being held; Berkeley and Stanford do pretty well in that competition.
But just in case - it’s cool, I wasn’t being judgmental.
> What does stanford offer undergrads that berkeley doesnt? IMO access to legacies and the larger alumni network is about it
Non-academic advantages (e.g. athletics programs, student housing, etc.) are still advantages.
Berkeley has its own set of non-academic advantages, such as closer proximity and access to San Francisco (via BART).