I get thousands of hits of people reading my articles. You are perhaps the first who really cared that much over the last 13 years. But I mainly write on my blog for me and those who want to read. I am not mad hungry for visitors - I have plenty - but if people want to read then all the better.

I have read a few lines in the Bible, there for I am an expert. I have read a few lines of a medical text book, therefore I can perform operations. I have read a line of a blog post, therefore I know what the blog post says and about the author.

(Also, in response to your earlier criticism about design. What do you think design is? Prettiness? Design is about the simplest answer to the problem. As you would have read - that was a Live Redesign, and since has been changed with yet more fiddling. It was not meant to be.)

The truth is I received hundreds of responses via Twitter and Email (some seemed scared to talk so openly about such a problem for fear of being ostracised.) It is a problem and one I wanted to discuss. I've seen it less so in the Ruby world mainly because front-end is much easier to master and slower moving. The Ruby world is less forgiving - remember Yehuda's heckling earlier this year.

So I wrote a post about what I felt was a serious matter and you decided that you had read one sentence and it offended you because of your snap judgement that you knew who I was. You decided that I know nothing about design based on your subjective knowledge (and looking at your Geocities-style abomination of a website - this doesn't help you any further) and the fact that I am dyslexic and perhaps don't always get the words that I want to say out correctly. It was a needless comment that held no value to the thread, to the subject matter or anything.

If you had said "This content is hard to read. I wish the author would rewrite it" then I would have acknowledged that and even perhaps done that. As I have done once before. Instead you tried to act clever (even failing the mark on one of the corrections.)