Hacker News Reader

Maybe. Or maybe it does signal intent. Either way it’s a valid reaction to a stupid edit.

This article is attempting to read into something that is much more likely nothing... some intern clicked the wrong button or whatever.

Again, the website has zero impact on the law. It literally doesn't matter.

Is there a delete habeas corpus button? The specific search the current administration happens to be hitting legal challenges on?

All of this heavy breathing leaves out that the edit also deletes the U.S. Navy, I mean, if it had any legally binding impact, which thankfully, a website does not.

“Legally Binding” is determined by the courts. The process of overturning sections of the constitution start with claiming they were never there.

The current admin spent months saying the 14th amendment essentially isn’t valid, so they could justify it to their base once they got SCOTUS to overturn birthright citizenship, despite it being plainly enumerated in the 14th amendment.

I've heard ideas I liked less. Let's give the damned airedales back to the Army while we're at it, hey? Buncha fancified cavalry-wannabe jagoffs, they've had swelled heads for fifty years.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com