> It does appear that this is part of a site-wide refactor where some material got lost because the same truncation is visible in the annotation page

You mean that if you already assume it wasn't malicious, there must be a problem that affected multiple pages because the source material in the build somewhere got lost.

> This is (obviously?) an error and assuming any sort of malice over incompetence here makes you seem like a moron.

Giving any benefit of any doubts to this administration makes you actually a moron.