While I love this list, I do not like that you are blaming everything on CEO.
This company followed current ethical policies, and used them to exclude actual experts and skilled people. CEO operated in environment that supports this behaviour, and only cares about irelevant metrics!
My point is where such companies get funding?! They produce garbage and should go bankrupt pretty fast! But somehow "investors" kept feeding them money, because they are super "ethical"!
in this case you'd just hire a marketing org that uses AI a lot and hope that the trust has enough money to keep them doing their job for a while
But again, this is not juzt about CEO (he deserves the blame), but why he was able to operate for so long, and why his critics vere silenced!
the dude did everything he could to fly under the radar, but only just enough. it is why the report is so damning -- much of what he did was just blatantly, balls-out bad, and all of the signs were there consistently.
Rush is dead, so it is comfortable for the above to blame only him.
The board knew about the issues. The layer knew the accusation is fake and designed to shut up the whistleblower.