Be honest. How much of this article did you write, and how much did ChatGPT write?
Why should it matter beyond correctness of the content, which you and the author need to evaluate either way.
Personally, I'm exhausted with this sentiment. There's no value in questioning how something gets written, only the output matters. Otherwise we'd be asking the same about pencils, typewriters, dictionaries and spellcheck in some pointless persuit of purity.
Now the existence of this blogpost is only evidence that the author has sufficient AI credits they are able to throw some release notes at Claude and generate some markdown, which is not really differentiating.