Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by wizzwizz4 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

wizzwizz4

DuckDuckGo search results for "cli, extract frame 13s into video" (no quotes):

• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10957412/fastest-way-to-...

• https://superuser.com/questions/984850/linux-how-to-extract-...

• https://www.aleksandrhovhannisyan.com/notes/video-cli-cheat-...

• https://www.baeldung.com/linux/ffmpeg-extract-video-frames

• https://ottverse.com/extract-frames-using-ffmpeg-a-comprehen...

Search engines have been able to translate "vague natural language queries" into search results for a decade, now. This pre-existing infrastructure accounts for the vast majority of ChatGPT's apparent ability to find answers.

View on HN

Yet the interface is fundamentally different, the output feels much more like bro pages[0] and it's within a click of clipboarding, one CTRL V away from extracting the 13th second screenshot. I've been using Google the past 24 years and my google-fu has always left people amazed; yet I can no longer bother to go through Stack Exchange's results when an LLM not only spits it out so nicely, but also does the equivalent of a explainshell[1].

Not comparable and I fail to see why going through Google's ads/results would be better?

[0] https://github.com/pombadev/bropages

[1] https://github.com/idank/explainshell

DuckDuckGo insists on shoving "AI Assist" entries in its results, so I have a reasonable idea of how often LLMs are completely wrong even given search results. The answer's still "more than one time in five".

I did not suggest using Google Search (the company's on record as deliberately making Google Search worse), but there are other search engines. My preferred search engines don't do the fancy "interpret natural language queries" pre-processing, because I'm quite good at doing that in my head and often want to research niche stuff, but there are many still-decent search engines that do, and don't have ads in the results.

Heck, you can even pay for a good search engine! And you can have it redirect you to the relevant section of the top search result automatically: Google used to call this "I'm feeling lucky!" (although it was before URI text fragments, so it would just send you to the top of the page). All the properties you're after, much more cheaply, and you keep the information about provenance, and your answer is more-reliably accurate.

> Heck, you can even pay for a good search engine!

Can you recommend one?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com