>For any file you distribute that contains code from the software (in source code or binary format), you must provide recipients the source code to that file along with a copy of this license, which license will govern that file.
So your nuget package and github release would be a binary distribution, what license applies? It's the reciprocal license, not your attempt to attach a maintenance fee for clicking download license.
And this clause doubles down
>If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of this license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of the software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under a license that complies with this license.
Your license essentially explicitly disallows you from doing what your trying to do. Will anyone test you for $10/m or just using a competitor? Maybe not.
This also goes horribly against the spirit of open source software, if every small package on a Linux distro did this it'd cost tens of thousands at least to even launch the OS. But the attempt to backdoor downloads from a package repository is what I find most heinous here.