OpenAI did not participate in the actual competition nor were they taking spots away from humans. OpenAI just gave the problems to their AI under the same time limit and conditions (no external tool use)
> nor put any engineers under duress of having to pull all-nighters.
Under duress? At a company like this, all of the people working on this project are there because they want to be and they’re compensated millions.
This sounds very like Ferrari claiming that their cars can drive fast enough to get gold in the Olympic games 100 meter sprint.
It's more like a chess engine claiming master level performance (back when that was an achievement)
- "[AI is] far away from being substantially being better than MCTs"
^ pick only one
Whether or not they’re far away from being better than humans is up to debate, but the entire point of these types of benchmarks it to compare them to humans.
Yeah same way computers and robots should be able to win World Chess Championship, 100m dash and Wimbledon.
>>but the entire point of these types of benchmarks it to compare them to humans
The entire point of the competition is to fight against participants who are similar to you, have similar capabilities and go through similar struggles. If you want bot vs human competitions - great - organize it yourself instead of hijacking well established competitions out there.