You'd think that this would not appeal to anyone, but they actually have a great turnout every year. Quite amazing actually.
The book the kid had read was Dinosailors which is about some dinosaurs who go on a sailing trip. The memorable part of the book is the page with no words that's just the dinosaurs throwing up because they all got seasick.
So, the non-verbal child happily reenacted their favorite part of the book.
The next page illustration is epic.
Though I have worked with children enough to sympathize with the not-beautiful part of this story too. (also that book sounds rad as hell.)
Probably not; they really just wanted to make sure they didn't get out pizzaed.
> Is eating pizza regularly the good habit to build?
Pizza is a fairly balanced food, depending on toppings. Generally some protein, some vegetables. Macronutrient wise, it's a bit carb heavy, but not overwhelmingly so. Usually not a lot of added sugar, unless you're having a BBQ pizza, and not that much natural sugar either; some places might put more sugar into the pizza sauce though.
> Is using food as a reward a good habit?
No, probably not. But free food is a pretty effective motivator, so people use it.
Just because there's comparatively little sugar in pizza, does not make it a fairly balanced food. It's high in fat and consequently high in calories. Case in point: that personal pan pizza from Pizza Hut is the size of a man's palm and has around 600 calories. 600! For a young child, that tiny thing alone is a third of the total recommended [1] daily calory intake. My son is 10, and he could probably eat 4 or 5 of these suckers easily.
[1] https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-s...
At standard ratios [2], that's 63 kcal from fat, 68 from carbs, 24 from protein. Or
41% fat, 44% carb, 15% protein. Your resource suggests 25-35% calories from fat, so it's not that far off the goal. I'm not saying it's well balanced, just that it's fairly balanced.
> For a young child, that tiny thing alone is a third of the total recommended daily calory intake.
A third of the total recommended intake sounds appropriate for a meal?
> My son is 10, and he could probably eat 4 or 5 of these suckers easily.
Ok, but he's got to read 4 or 5 books for that, and maybe over several weeks? I'm not really sure how to address this. If you are going to eat 4 complete personal pizzas if available, then you probably should avoid them.
> A third of the total recommended intake sounds appropriate for a meal?
Only superficially, I think. First, this pizza can hardly be considered "a meal" because it's too small to be filling. That's why I pointed out that even a 10-year old will probably not be satiated by just one such pizza.
But also, a third of your daily calorie budget allocated to just the food part of one meal assumes the classic model of three meals a day (breakfast, lunch, dinner) - but beware that many people take in additional calories via inbetween snacks (esp. kids).
Also, the pizza only accounts for the food part of that meal - so you better be drinking just water along with it. Except that most kids don't. [1] So, it's a bit of a fallacy to assume that a third of your recommended daily intake of calories is what can be alloted to the food part of a single meal. It might be okay, but like I hopefully was able to highlight, it's easy to undercount because of other factors such as snacks and drinks.
Also note that food labels are not super accurate [2], and of course it's in any junk food company's interest to make their meals look better than they actually might be.
> Ok, but he's got to read 4 or 5 books for that, and maybe over several weeks? I'm not really sure how to address this. If you are going to eat 4 complete personal pizzas if available, then you probably should avoid them.
Agreed. Let's keep in mind that these are not full sized pizzas, and my son is very active (and slim). But the problem is that highly palatable foods like pizza are just so damn hard to avoid in practice. It's too easy (and enjoyable!) to overeat on them.
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db271.htm
[2] https://www.businessinsider.com/calorie-labels-arent-accurat...
It's that low effort comments are followed by troll-lighting the original commenter as the troll, downvoting their post, upvoting ones own. That is - often the biggest troll in the room is the one accusing others of trolling.
Why would this not appeal to anyone? Summer reading games are super popular and kids love getting small prizes
Was really easy to game though. Our school library had a selection of books for what I can only assume were for special needs kids, really really simple books very few words with even fewer pages. These books rewarded an appropriate amount of points however so you got less, but you could easily bang out 20 of those books in one class and get a lot more points than you'd be rewarded for reading a real book.
A few of us would just go over grab a bunch of those books and read through them in like 2 minutes and complete the quiz.
They ended up not letting those books get used for AR
It was a pretty cool system.
The lottery system described upstream is terrible.
But with Accelerated Reader you would accumulate points that you could spend on things like the Scholastic Book Fair (buy books), slices of pizza for lunch, and various toy gadgets. Sometimes a teacher would sell some gimmick like a get out of homework ticket.
Of course, you'd have to read a good number of books to receive any of these prizes. But you were always working towards something unlike a lottery system which isn't motivating at all.