In the USA? Where you can be sued if someone slips on your sidewalk? Can't you sue the gvmt?
We looked into anything that could be done to minimise the chances of such a thing happening to innocent parties, but the only option was to make a complaint about an individual officer. There's no (easy, obvious) way to question the system they use to determine "validity" of raids or due diligence prior to requesting a warrant, or evidence required to justify a warrant.
The whole thing just felt to me like it was blindly rubber stamped all the way through because "protect the children". Pity my daughter was a child and absorbs such experiences... My son was also a child, but he's less affected by such things.
But God forbid if you're ever caught for any crime whatsoever. Or if you're detained for domestic violence. Especially if not in Dubai (which is miles more lenient than other emirates).
So, Norway, Dennmark, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, France, Spain, Austria, Switzerland
So what exactly are you referring to?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-woman-given-harsher-senten...
https://www.foxnews.com/media/germany-started-criminal-inves...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/10/autistic-teenage...
https://www.dw.com/en/germany-greens-habeck-presses-charges-...
Germany and the UK seem to be the worst offenders in regards to this, but that may just be selection bias on what gets into English language media. I can pull more articles if you're actually interested.
I think it's fair to demand that people follow laws on the internet as in person. Germany has laws against supporting nazism and for good reason. I don't give a crap about those people's right to free speech. The laws against insulting politicians seem a bit less reasonable but honestly just don't call people names online. Can't say I'm bothered by these articles.
Mention to them that the only way Communism and Nazism differ is Nazism following Engel's nationalist approach to overthrowing capitalism rather than Marx's international one and Nazis having been obsessed with spiritual and Iranian occultism and you're met with blank stares.
Yet those are the fundamentals of Nazism everything else derives from. Including the Holocaust.
Same goes for the understanding of the Nazis "Nationalism". Most Germans just won't believe you when you tell them that it was an absurd use of that term and much more similar to the modern "pro-EU" mindset than the modern understanding of nationalism.
The Germans are propagandized into thinking the definition of Nazis is being called "rightwing" by the media and wanting decentralization of power and cultural homogenity (modern nationalism). Yet the left:
- has already its SA precursors back on the streets (Hammerbande, Antifa, "NGOs")
- is getting rid of free speech to the maximum extent they somehow can pull off within the limits of the law and beyond that through mandatory voluntary industry initiatives (e.g. "Trusted Flaggers")
- are manufacturing external enemies at fault for all wrong (the Russians)
- is spinning up the war machine (massive military spending at 5% of GDP, near limitless commitment to finance the Ukraine war instead of trying to push for peace)
- Are centralizing more and more power in the hands of highly intransparent or even unelected institutions (e.g. EU or international contracts)
And various other stuff. E.g. some of the stuff you can hear on e.g. party congresses of the German "Die Linke".
And Japan, while being clean, safe and Kawai, its legal system has like a 90%+ conviction rate, so make of this what you will.
Sure you can sue anybody for anything. Whether your case actually gets heard or not is another consideration. And even if it gets heard, the judge can simply dismiss it for a variety of reasons before proceeding to trial.
Also, state and the federal governments have sovereign immunity and qualified immunity. Basically the government has to allow itself to be sued.
True this doesn't apply to counties or cities, however there is still a much higher bar for tort even for local police. Generally if they are operatikng within the law, like executing a valid search warrant, the standard is much higher than it would be for an average citizen.
Meerly suffering harm from government action is not sufficient. Having property impounded as part of an investigation, pursuant to a warrant, is likely not actionable, unless there was malice involved. Using slim evidence isn't really actionable.
When the police abuse their power, it's the community that pays their salaries that feels the pain.