> An administrative law judge decided that the economic impact would be more than the $100 million threshold.

I do find it fascinating that one administrator has the ability to claim, seemingly from thin air, that it would be more than 100mil and so cancel the entire rule. Wouldn't it be better if the rule was reviewed AFTER the year to determine if modifications or Analysis should be performed?

Seems that when it comes to consumer protections in the US the companies are ALWAYS given the benefit of the doubt.