That said, I think it would be safe to say I don't understand this statistic. Needing a day of answer from your health provider feels rare to me. The few times I've needed that, I would go to an emergency room.
Even with insurance, in my area, neurologists book out 3-6 months.
Your own link offers this summary:
> A common misconception in the U.S. is that countries with universal health care have much longer wait times. However, data from nations with universal coverage, coupled with historical data from coverage expansion in the United States, show that patients in other nations often have similar or shorter wait times.
No insurance? The only care you can't be denied over payment is emergency care. (And the definition is narrow - they'll give you pain meds and IV fluids for your cancer and send you home. They will not do surgery/chemo for it without payment.)
As a bonus, Sweden's setup costs half as much, with similar outcomes. That's inclusive of taxation. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/11/health-at-a-gla...
That’s not to say the US healthcare system isn’t in need of massive reform, just that it’s a much more complicated problem than many realize.
I also question if using a neurologist wait time is illuminating? What is the average wait time by country for that one? Quick searches shows that isn't necessarily extremely high, either.
Ultimately, Americans wait for care just like participants in other health systems. It's just a lot more likely to result in a big bill, too.
The last time my doctor had to reschedule, the next appointment was over 2 months out. Admittedly, it was a reschedule of a yearly checkup, and being 2 months overdue for that isn't a huge deal; but it does indicate lack of "supply".
This was all with good insurance, and the _ability_ to pay out of pocket if I needed to. There is a lack of supply for health care at the moment, at least in the area I live in (NE US).
> Needing a day of answer from your health provider feels rare to me. The few times I've needed that, I would go to an emergency room.
Going to the emergency room for something like the flu or other condition that is easily treatable but needs a diagnosis/test is... crazy. The cost difference between a doctor's visit and the emergency room is staggering.
And fair that flu or something shouldn't need emergency room, but there are also urgent care clinics that are good for that sort of thing. And the few times I've had to call my doctor, I got through just fine.
Which is all to say, in a distribution, you expect variance. I've largely always found myself on the low end of these distributions, so I'm curious what the distribution is.
And I fully cede that we should continue to strive to get better.
We are typical in wait times and outcomes.
We pay 2-3x as much as the rest of the developed world for that.
https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/health-spending.html
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/06/society-at-a-gl...
It's also worth noting that visiting Urgent Care clinics is getting more and more expensive, with insurance covering less and less of it. It's frustrating, because they really are a convenient system.
https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/getmedia/80e07f2b-b8a4-44f0-b...
> A hospital-based urgent care clinic is a clinic that is owned and operated by a hospital… Services provided at hospital-based urgent care clinics must be billed in the same way they would be billed if those services were provided at the hospital.
Yes, it's typical with the addition of being insanely expensive and cost is totally unpredictable even with insurance.
I suppose if there were clearly a serious enough concern they'd book me much quicker. But for semi-routine visits ("probably not an issue, but we should get a specialist's opinion"), under 2 months is rare.
Everything else wrong with US healthcare aside, I'm pretty sure we have better wait times on average.
Maybe I'm just lucky, but it's usually within a couple weeks.