> It is, but directly, not as a subversion.

It is directly challenged in the very thread linked in the article (and likely before, the drama is ancient).

Also, there is no "less stringent reviewer", it's always been the same you!

So your example fails at both core points, yet your outcome is still the same happy firing!

At least for paid work you can just sprinkle $ to cover up such mistakes and find someone else, but wait, this is also not paid work!