If the goal is to fund full-time development of something and they don’t know if they are going to get the funding for seven months, they will have to take employment elsewhere. If they take employment elsewhere, when the funding comes in, they will have to turn it down or quit the job they just got. Seems like it forces an unpleasant choice.
In my experience, that's not the goal most FOSS projects have in mind from day 1. You might be working somewhere else, yet still release FOSS software and if it something in particular gets traction and makes sense to spend longer time on, you might start considering trying to be funded for full-time in some way.
But unless you have some following/funding from earlier, I don't think people jump feet first into FOSS like that, expecting "full-time employment" pay working on their project, but starts with something with smaller sources of income, like Open Collective or GitHub Sponsors/
Most FOSS projects from day one, no. But I would say that it’s the goal for most FOSS projects when they apply for funding. Paying for development time is surely the most common use for this money, right?
> But unless you have some following/funding from earlier, I don't think people jump feet first into FOSS like that, expecting "full-time employment" pay working on their project, but starts with something with smaller sources of income, like Open Collective or GitHub Sponsors/
If the smaller sources of income don’t pay the bills then the dilemma still occurs, and if they do pay the bills then the funding isn’t needed.
Yes, but I'm guessing most are applying for funding before quitting their full-time jobs, not after. So there isn't really anything to plan if they don't have any realistic chance at spending full-time on the project.
> If the smaller sources of income don’t pay the bills then the dilemma still occurs, and if they do pay the bills then the funding isn’t needed.
The dilemma of what, continue doing what they've been doing; releasing and maintaining FOSS, without being paid for it?
From my earlier comment:
> If they take employment elsewhere, when the funding comes in, they will have to turn it down or quit the job they just got. Seems like it forces an unpleasant choice.