It wasn't. It's the dumbest name ever.
Or the Teams download page that had two different versions - Teams for Home and Teams for Work/School.
Or .NET->.NET Core & .NET Framework->Back to .NET again.
EDIT:
There's even a rule of acquisition that could possibly apply here: #239 - Never be afraid to mislabel a product.
I got this on mobile. Seems to be pretty apt.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/microsoft-offi...
I got there by going to office.com and clicking Products > Microsoft Office. Lol. Rofl, even. This has made my day. And we all thought calling their third generation console Xbox One was the worst possible branding decision.
Are they aware that people will struggle to find if Office is installed and that they will keep calling it Office til the end of times (aka the next rebranding that will revert back things) anyway?
IBM used to be a repeat offender. I recall trying to buy the WebSphere (Java) application server for a client and then finding out that IBM had slapped "WebSphere" on all their products including things like¹ MQ Series (a queue) and DB/2 (a database). It took me an hour to figure out the right item and it was an online purchase!
¹I might be misremembering the exact products but it was similarly absurd.
So you get your copilot for m365 subscription and add copilot studio which you use to create co pilots
This is all information taken from office.com, not some joke or exaggeration...
Looking at the two side by side in an app manager, I see:
- Copilot - com.microsoft.copilot
- M365 Copilot - com.microsoft.office.officehubrow
And they both have identical icon, except the latter has a tiny black rectangle with tiny white "M365" label tucked in the corner.
Somewhere between that and a master's degree and 10 years at a prestigious marketing firm, though, apparently there's some lessons about how you should smear all your brands all over each other in some bid to, I presume, transfer any good will one may have had to all of them, but it seems to me that they could stand to send those people back to MKT101 again, because the principle of labeling what your product actually is seems to elude them after Too Much Education.
If anything, Marketing 101 works as a scaffolding but you learn the real lessons later on (basically like with every other vocational training wrapped in a degree, including especially computer science) - but also, and perhaps more importantly, it serves as a fig leaf. You can point to that and say, it's a Science and an Art and is Principled and done well It Is For The Good Of All Mankind, and keep the veneer of legitimacy over what's in practice a more systematized way of bringing harm to your fellow humans.
Also specifically wrt. brands - brands as quality signals mostly died out a decade or more ago; mixing them up is just a way to get their decaying corpses to trick more people for a little longer.
Openned: https://copilot.microsoft.com
Same prompt: ffmpeg command to convert movie.mov into a reasonably sized mp4