I can't see how, in 100 years (or maybe even just 50) humans will still need more than ONE computer programming language. Or at the most two. We might always need C++ to exist for low level stuff, but we only need ONE higher level language.
I can't see how, in 100 years (or maybe even just 50) humans will still need more than ONE computer programming language. Or at the most two. We might always need C++ to exist for low level stuff, but we only need ONE higher level language.
Not really.
I know people think they are... but then some people think water can magically be imbued with healing powers.
Here's how that works:
https://www.howdoeshomeopathywork.com/
LLMs are 99% hype. They can't think, or reason, or count... or program.
What makes you think I can't?
https://leaddev.com/technical-direction/ai-models-cant-under...
https://www.codeflash.ai/post/llms-struggle-to-write-perform...
https://community.openai.com/t/llms-seem-to-be-flawed-at-the...
It's late, I couldn't be bothered to search for more than 30 sec.
Your statement is as incorrect as your others.
That is the core position of all religions. Faith over evidence.
1. Is it any good, though? Does it work well?
2. Is it better than you could do by hand?
3. Do you care that the vast environmental footprint of the racks of servers that are vastly inefficiently wasting energy to do your job for you – badly – are destroying the planet and meaning that my child has no future?
Because I care a lot about that.
In the past several weeks I've accomplished what would've taken me several YEARS to do, pre-AI.
But throughout this thread you offer no evidence, no citations, just your own extremist unsupported opinions, mixed with ad hominem abuse. I am done. If I knew how to block people on HN I would block you.