Hacker News Reader

Comment by righthand | Hacker News Reader

No but it definitely normalizes the issues around homelessness as no big deal when you write something where you’re intentionally homeless for financial gain.

View on HN

Does it? How so? If anything it showcases some of the trials otherwise unknown to those who don’t face them (eg weather, tent mold).

Those are trials of camping. The cops coming and tossing your tent and everything else you own in a dumpster, that's a trial of homelessness.

This was specifically addressed in the blogpost. This is illegal in Hong Kong too.

And it didn't happen and if it had then he'd have crashed on a friend's sofa. And his laptop and two suits would have been safe in a locker at university.

An actual homeless person would have a quite different experience of a bust.

> And it didn't happen

"I decide who is homeless and who isn't in retrospect by analyzing whether something happened to their tent in the woods or whether they were not discovered".

Sure. That's easier for you than talking about how differently things go with the cops for a rich university student caught tent camping on a lark, than for someone who is actually homeless.

Yes it does. A real homeless person doesn't go to the gym everyday to shower, or avoids bringing food to his tent but it's ok because "I can eat at the university", or charges his devices every day at the same university, or sleeps at their friend's place when the weather is too dangerous.

If was an interesting read and experiment, but it has its limitations as a real world comparison to homelessness.

You're right that this situation was very privileged. But there's not such thing as a "real homeless", it's a continuum. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44215698

Also, virtually all the "real homeless" I met went to the gym to shower.

A real homeless person defecates on the ground and dumps his trash wherever he goes. That is the reason they are unwanted

Reply on news.ycombinator.com