The argument is that Amazon controls 30% currently, so 70% is "fair game".
It's a pretty weak argument considering that Amazon has the infrastructure muscle out someone like Bufferbox, if there is no distinct competitive advantage for the startup.
It's a pretty weak argument considering that Amazon has the infrastructure muscle out someone like Bufferbox, if there is no distinct competitive advantage for the startup.
If that is the case, then Bufferbox is in a more defensible position.
And of course, the open platform to all carriers.