To be honest though, I’ve never been able to replicate that environment again, and it was pre-remote-first days. Might’ve been pure luck, or maybe we just understood how working with people you like is very enjoyable, despite the office politics.
To be honest though, I’ve never been able to replicate that environment again, and it was pre-remote-first days. Might’ve been pure luck, or maybe we just understood how working with people you like is very enjoyable, despite the office politics.
Worst thing ever, nothing is more harmful than a enemy who appears as a friend. This is even more true at workplace, as you are competing with your colleagues for promotions, bonuses, RSUs, travel opportunities etc. Whether one likes to acknowledge this are not, you are actually competing with them.
Another big issue with this sort of this is, it creates all kinds of untold social contracts which eventually nobody abides by. You wouldn't expect your friend to scheme behind your back to have you stack ranked in the bottom 10%, get your fired. Save his own job and have himself promoted. But in nearly every layoff cycle, this is exactly what happens.
Having a social life is actually a good thing!
Not sure if you know this, due to cost centers, companies have per team budgets. Quite literally, X gets bonuses at the expense of Y.
Im not saying people act out of malice. But the game is designed such that somebody needs to lose for the other to win. Its like a pie chart, more area a section occupies, less there is for others.
Apologies, but I don’t like when people outright talk nonsense about my friends, lowering them down to numbers.
The more area a section occupies on a pie chart, the less area other sections get.
>>Apologies, but I don’t like when people outright talk nonsense about my friends, lowering them down to numbers.
But long time ago, I've been part of a company, that despite being sort of Accenture-style dev shop (meaning we were competing them for dev projects and often would win on our reputation and competence, not undercutting the price with cheap labor, also quite a few people moved from them to us), yet the atmosphere was extremely friendly. The cca original team still meets after more than 15 years when most went other ways.
I've never seen or heard about anything similar. It attracted and retained top talent much more efficiently than high salaries.
Yeah, I mean, they don't exactly go around announcing how the whole thing is done. You often don't know who won at your cost.
Offer optional outside-of-work activities like team buildings, going together to pub. And I mean really optional. No bullshit, honesty and some good hard work. Very flat managerial hierarchy where owners actually listened and acted, and managers and employees acted and communicated as equals.
That's about it. Maybe it wouldn't be enough these days, but back then we were the best game in town and attracted best folks from other companies due to above, without the need to pay higher than rest of high payers.