Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by ZeroGravitas | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

ZeroGravitas

No.

In places with functional government they actually implemented it at the cost of the producers.

"Extended producer responsibility"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_producer_responsibili...

It's not perfect but it's okay, and better than the alternatives.

In the US they pretended they were going to do it then never did anything to put it into practice.

When people realised this they didn't get angry at the corporations or the politicians they bought. They just decided that the thing that all the relevant experts recommended was a scam that they were too smart to fall for.

See recent YouTube video "Does recycling even do anything?" by Simon Clark for some more realistic takes on recycling.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iOtrvBdRx8I

View on HN

WHy is your initial answer 'no' when the backend of the answer is functionally "But they got away with the recycling scam."

Seems like your initial answer would actually be 'yes?' Specifically because the "non-functional governments were unable to implement this as a cost to the producers."

Plastics producers are absolutely trying to shift the blame of these failed programs onto "personal responsibility."

Because the scam wasn't recycling, it was pretending to recycle and not doing it.

Just as a company promising to use solar energy and not doing so doesn't discredit solar energy.

And as you can see by the reactions around you, no one is angry that the recycling isn't being done. They're angry at the recycling. A process that directly completes with big oil's product. That's the scam.

Sorry, how is recycling not the scam if they were actually just pretending to recycle and not doing it?

At scale if every (or even 90% of them) solar company were pretending to get solar energy, I would absolutely consider it a scam

Also, for the most part, my understanding of plastics recycling is that it doesn't really exist in practice. Glass Recycling, and Paper Recycling are actually able to reclaim most of the product, but plastic recycling is actually only downcycling where it can be used for a different purpose.

If the point you're trying to make is "No, because some recycling is done as advertised, and therefore recycling in general isn't a scam" then agreed, but that's not what was asked. The question you responded "No" to was "Did 'Big Oil' Sell Us on a Recycling Scam".

The objectively correct answer is yes. Some entities running a recycling scam does not mean that all recycling is a scam. Doesn't even mean all plastic recycling is a scam. But all the same, a scam is being run to charge people for a service that isn't being performed as advertised, knowingly and intentionally and in a significant way.

> Just as a company promising to use solar energy and not doing so doesn't discredit solar energy.

Just because someone successfully dupes people with a scam doesn't suddenly make it not a scam, just as people acquiescing to the hypernormalization of enshittification in the real for lack of a sense of agency in the face of megacorps with megabucks and congress in their back pocket does not mean that what people are apathetic towards isn't a problem or that there aren't people justifiably upset about it.

There are second order discussion points on this topic that you're trying to dig at that are worth discussing, but it's hard to engage in those in good faith when your answer to the fundamental question "Do you think this scam that is objectively a scam, is a scam?" is "No."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com